Relationship splits

Relationship Property - Economic Disparity:
What does it mean for you?

Section 15 of the Property Relationships Act 1976 was introduced to address issues of inequality between partners following a breakdown of their relationship.  The section empowers the Court, following a division of relationship property, to compensate a spouse/partner if his or her living standards and income will be significantly less than the other party because of the division of functions in the relationship.

Some people can go a little overboard


The intention behind the section is to recognise that one partner may be economically disadvantaged as a result of a relationship ending because of the division of functions during the relationship.  That disadvantage will not be overcome by an equal division of relationship property.

Reported decisions on the section are now accumulating and the limits of the section are being tested. 

When Will It Apply?

The section will apply where there is a real and significant difference between the respective income and living standards of each partner.  The disparity must arise from the division of functions in the relationship and not, for example, from a difference in earning capacities which existed before the relationship began.

The most typical circumstance will be where one party compromises a career to look after children and/or to assist a high flying partner to increase his or her earning capacity. 

Finally, for an award to be made, there must be circumstances which convince the Judge that it is just to compensate the disadvantaged party.  In considering whether it is just to make an award, a Judge will usually consider factors such as:

• The length of the relationship;
• The length of the career break;
• The length of time required to rectify the break in career path;
• The position of the children now and in the future;
• The career possibilities available to the disadvantaged person; and
• The amount of property available for division. 

This section has not produced a flood of claims but there has been a handful of decisions in both the Family Court and the High Court throughout New Zealand with awards ranging from $11,500.00 to $142,000.00. 

A good example of a successful claim by a former wife is the decision of Waters v Waters, a decision which was heard in the Family Court at Hamilton in August 2004. 

The case of Waters involved a marriage of 17 years with two children as a result of the marriage.  The husband was a policeman and the wife had been involved in management before the birth of the first child.  The wife had taken time out from her career because of childcare obligations and responsibility of the household management.  The husband’s ability to contribute on the domestic front had been limited by his shift work as a policeman.  There was an expectation by both parties that the wife would remain at home and take responsibility for the children, enabling the husband to work away from home and provide income. 

The Judge held that the wife had given up career opportunities and compromised her earning ability.  The husband on the other hand had been able to enjoy an uninterrupted career from which he benefited post-separation.  It was that division of responsibilities that the Judge concluded was the basic reason for the disparity in their respective economic divisions post-separation. 

The Judge concluded that if the wife had not left her employment following the birth of her first child, she would most likely have become a management accountant.  References indicated she was a capable employee and would have rapidly advanced within her company.

Evidence showed that remuneration consultants in the production sector (in which she had previously worked) with capable of attracting an income of $76,600.00 per annum but that given her break from the industry it was not likely that she would achieve an income of that level for at least seven years post-separation.

Taking all those factors into account the wife was awarded a sum of $75,000.00 in recognition of the economic disparity, such payment being by way of an adjustment to the division of matrimonial assets.

Be Aware

These decisions make it clear that in the event of a break-up, one partner may be entitled to make a claim under section 15 and the result is that, if successful, he or she may be entitled to a greater share of the relationship assets.

Should you have any enquiry concerning relationship issues, please contact Michael Robinson or Claire O’Donnell at Turner Hopkins Solicitors, Auckland.

All information in this article is to the best of the authors’ knowledge true and accurate. No liability is assumed by the authors, or publishers, for any losses suffered by any person relying directly or indirectly upon this article. It is recommended that readers should consult a senior representative of Turner Hopkins before acting upon this information.

Sort by
  • New Member says
    The desire to make money online through the use of social platforms is perfectly normal. In order to achieve this quest, an optimal blogging system is required. A sound blogging system would allow its user adopt a systematic approach to quench his blogging endeavors.Formal Shoes Pakistan
  • New Member says
    Uptime is one of the most important factors in maintaining an effective online presence. Outages of any duration can be costly. Downtime can impact your organization directly by causing lost sales, signups, etc., or indirectly by hurting your reputation and brand image.pakistani shoes brands list
  • chinto says
    Very nice blog and articles. I am realy very happy to visit your blog. Now I am found which I actually want. I check your blog everyday and try to learn something from your blog. Thank you and waiting for your new post. best ps4 skins
  • New Member says
    Relationship Splits are great and I need some more information so that you can help writing a research paper for me and it will be so good for me. It is only good for me.
  • New Member says
    A$AP Rocky is back. As he gears up for the release of his forthcoming album, the Harlem rapper returned last week with a dizzying, Dexter Navy-directed music video for “A$AP Forever”: Birkenstocks On Sale a new track featuring an extensive sample of Moby’s “Porcelain”.While any new music from Rocky is most welcome, fashion observers and Christian Louboutin Outlet style vultures were more intrigued to see what Flacko was wearing throughout the cut. Unsurprisingly, the footage flagged up an abundance Fitflops Clearance of hyped jawnz and grails, with Alexander Wang, AWGE, Midnight Studios, and of course, Raf Simons, just some of the labels Fitflop Shoes on display.Enlisting the help of Highsnobiety commerce curator and veritable style encyclopedia Nigel Minani, I set about breaking down Rocky and Cheap Birkenstocks Sandals friends’ ‘fits. Peep the list below and let us know your favorite pieces.
    Sneakers are many things to many people—from professional Cheap Ray Bans athletes who need the latest tech to the sneakerhead who stacks boxes high just to have a few pairs on ice. MBT Sandals But one defining aspect is that they represent comfort in a field full of uncomfortable footwear.But finding a sneaker that stays Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses secure without being overly tight, offers all-day support that won’t fade and doesn’t feel like a sweatbox is not an easy Fitflops On Sale task. Not to mention, our feet contain about one quarter of all the bones in the human body, and arch height, Mbt Shoes Sale foot width and pressure points vary wildly. Point being: not every sneaker will be comfortable for every person.With that in mind Mbt Shoes however, we’ve compiled a list of some of the most comfortable sneakers on the market that you should consider picking up Christian Louboutin Shoes right now.
    Late last week, local Cleveland, Ohio, newspapers reported that a man had been shot and robbed of two pairs Birkenstock Sandals of YEEZYs at a meetup gone wrong.The article details that a Parma man traveled to Cleveland to sell both pairs before Mbt Shoes Outlet being shot and robbed in the city’s Brooklyn Centre neighborhood. The YEEZYs, which the police report claims were worth around $450 Christian Louboutin Sale each, were to be sold in a package deal for $800 to a man the victim had contacted through text messages.Upon Ray Ban Sunglasses arriving at the meetup with his cousin, things started to go wrong for the 19-year-old Parma man. One of the buyers Christian Louboutin reportedly claimed to have forgotten his wallet, before flashing a handgun and saying, “How about I take both?”The victim tried to Ray Ban Outlet put the shoes in the backseat of his car and leave but the police report claims the robber walked up to Fitflop Sandals the car Birkenstock Outlet and shot the man in the thigh. The report continues that the second robber took the kicks from the backseat before both ran off.
  • New Member says
    Thanks for the blog. It was very useful for me.keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. Thanks for sharing the useful information. ultimate guide Best penis enlargement
  • New Member says
    Thanks for the blog. It was very useful for me.keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. Thanks for sharing the useful information. ultimate guide Best penis enlargement pills

Post your comment

Want to have your say?

It's quick, easy and 100% free.



Endorsed Events

  • SpringBreakFIJI SpringBreakFIJI

    Secure your motivation for the year by locking in SpringBreak in Fiji, your own exclusive island

  • The Fijian Cup The Fijian Cup

    The Pacific Touch Rugby festival (Fijian Cup and Kava Cup) is underway on November 2, 2017 and with support from Touch Fiji and...

  • Rock Island FIJI Rock Island FIJI

    Jim Beam Rock Island is an all inclusive fully immersive travel experience which was brought into the music festival scene by Jim...

  • Summit FIJI Summit FIJI

    Summit FIJI aims to revolutionise how businesses can approach conferences, corporate retreats and team building weekends